firmware/br-ext-chip-allwinner/board/v83x/kernel/patches/00000-include_linux_bpf.h.p...

84 lines
2.8 KiB
Diff

diff -drupN a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h 2018-08-06 17:23:04.000000000 +0300
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h 2022-06-12 05:28:14.000000000 +0300
@@ -56,6 +56,9 @@ struct bpf_map {
atomic_t refcnt;
atomic_t usercnt;
struct work_struct work;
+#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
+ void *security;
+#endif
};
struct bpf_map_type_list {
@@ -189,6 +192,9 @@ struct bpf_prog_aux {
struct bpf_map **used_maps;
struct bpf_prog *prog;
struct user_struct *user;
+#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
+ void *security;
+#endif
union {
struct work_struct work;
struct rcu_head rcu;
@@ -241,6 +247,9 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, bpf_prog_active);
void bpf_register_prog_type(struct bpf_prog_type_list *tl);
void bpf_register_map_type(struct bpf_map_type_list *tl);
+extern const struct file_operations bpf_map_fops;
+extern const struct file_operations bpf_prog_fops;
+
struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_get(u32 ufd);
struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_get_type(u32 ufd, enum bpf_prog_type type);
struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_add(struct bpf_prog *prog, int i);
@@ -258,11 +267,11 @@ void bpf_map_area_free(void *base);
extern int sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled;
-int bpf_map_new_fd(struct bpf_map *map);
+int bpf_map_new_fd(struct bpf_map *map, int flags);
int bpf_prog_new_fd(struct bpf_prog *prog);
int bpf_obj_pin_user(u32 ufd, const char __user *pathname);
-int bpf_obj_get_user(const char __user *pathname);
+int bpf_obj_get_user(const char __user *pathname, int flags);
int bpf_percpu_hash_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value);
int bpf_percpu_array_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value);
@@ -277,6 +286,8 @@ int bpf_fd_array_map_update_elem(struct
void *key, void *value, u64 map_flags);
void bpf_fd_array_map_clear(struct bpf_map *map);
+int bpf_get_file_flag(int flags);
+
/* memcpy that is used with 8-byte aligned pointers, power-of-8 size and
* forced to use 'long' read/writes to try to atomically copy long counters.
* Best-effort only. No barriers here, since it _will_ race with concurrent
@@ -295,6 +306,9 @@ static inline void bpf_long_memcpy(void
/* verify correctness of eBPF program */
int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **fp, union bpf_attr *attr);
+
+struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_get_type_path(const char *name, enum bpf_prog_type type);
+
#else
static inline void bpf_register_prog_type(struct bpf_prog_type_list *tl)
{
@@ -322,6 +336,16 @@ static inline struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_
{
return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
}
+static inline int bpf_obj_get_user(const char __user *pathname)
+{
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+}
+
+static inline struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_get_type_path(const char *name,
+ enum bpf_prog_type type)
+{
+ return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
+}
#endif /* CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL */
/* verifier prototypes for helper functions called from eBPF programs */